Radeon RX 780 vs Radeon RX 6400

AMD

Radeon RX 780

2024Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2335 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6400

2022Core: 1923 MHzBoost: 2321 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 780

2024

Why buy it

  • 92.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 213.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 239.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 53W.

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $340 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 216.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Draws 53W instead of 180W, a 127W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 780 better than Radeon RX 6400?
Yes. Radeon RX 780 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 780 averages 92.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,658 vs 7,728 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 780 is a 2024 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Radeon RX 6400 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 780 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022, 400.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 780 is about 213.8% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 92.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (7,658 vs 7,728). Radeon RX 6400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 780 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon RX 6400 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
Is Radeon RX 6400 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon RX 6400 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $159 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 780 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low125 FPS104 FPS
medium114 FPS92 FPS
high96 FPS79 FPS
ultra82 FPS66 FPS
1440p
low108 FPS94 FPS
medium92 FPS80 FPS
high77 FPS67 FPS
ultra67 FPS56 FPS
4K
low59 FPS45 FPS
medium51 FPS42 FPS
high41 FPS31 FPS
ultra37 FPS28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low345 FPS158 FPS
medium276 FPS124 FPS
high230 FPS92 FPS
ultra172 FPS60 FPS
1440p
low258 FPS104 FPS
medium207 FPS81 FPS
high172 FPS60 FPS
ultra129 FPS42 FPS
4K
low160 FPS53 FPS
medium135 FPS41 FPS
high115 FPS33 FPS
ultra86 FPS20 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low345 FPS329 FPS
medium276 FPS278 FPS
high230 FPS210 FPS
ultra172 FPS172 FPS
1440p
low258 FPS232 FPS
medium207 FPS208 FPS
high172 FPS156 FPS
ultra129 FPS121 FPS
4K
low172 FPS134 FPS
medium138 FPS121 FPS
high115 FPS82 FPS
ultra86 FPS54 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low323 FPS251 FPS
medium260 FPS186 FPS
high223 FPS165 FPS
ultra172 FPS138 FPS
1440p
low243 FPS192 FPS
medium203 FPS139 FPS
high170 FPS126 FPS
ultra129 FPS101 FPS
4K
low144 FPS101 FPS
medium126 FPS74 FPS
high102 FPS65 FPS
ultra85 FPS50 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and Radeon RX 6400

AMD

Radeon RX 780

The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 2321 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon RX 780) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6400).

FeatureRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
G3D Mark Score
7,658
7,728
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
3840+400%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
35.87 TFLOPS+906%
3.565 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2335 MHz
2321 MHz
ROPs
96+200%
32
TMUs
240+400%
48
L1 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR 3 + AFMF
FSR 3 + AFMF
Ray Tracing Cores
60+400%
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.

FeatureRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3
FSR 3
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
128 GB/s
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).

FeatureRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
Encoder
RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine
None
Decoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 109% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
TDP
180W
53W-71%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
172mm
Height
112mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
42.5
145.8+243%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 6400 costs 68.1% less ($340 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 217.6% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon RX 780Radeon RX 6400
MSRP
$499
$159-68%
Performance per Dollar
15.3
48.6+218%
Codename
Navi 32
Navi 24
Release
September 11 2024
January 19 2022
Ranking
#131
#330