
Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅92.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌213.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌239.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 53W.
Radeon RX 6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 216.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 180W, a 127W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 780
2024Radeon RX 6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅92.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 216.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 180W, a 127W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌213.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌239.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 53W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 780 better than Radeon RX 6400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6400 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and Radeon RX 6400

Radeon RX 780
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 2321 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon RX 780) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,658 | 7,728 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+400% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS+906% | 3.565 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+400% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+400% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 109% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 53W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 172mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 145.8+243% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 6400 costs 68.1% less ($340 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 217.6% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $159-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 48.6+218% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | Navi 24 |
| Release | September 11 2024 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #131 | #330 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












