G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 780

2024

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
42.6% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

T1000

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon RX 780

2024

T1000

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
42.6% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 780 better than T1000?

Yes. Radeon RX 780 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,658 vs 7,649 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 780 is a 2024 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while T1000 is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 780 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

T1000 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $350 MSRP. Radeon RX 780 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 780 is about 42.6% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $350 MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $499 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and FSR 3 + AFMF.

Is T1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. T1000 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $350 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon RX 780 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR 3 + AFMF.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 780 Benchmark Check

T1000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 780	T1000
1080p
low	125 FPS	104 FPS
medium	114 FPS	89 FPS
high	96 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	108 FPS	90 FPS
medium	92 FPS	78 FPS
high	77 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	59 FPS	29 FPS
medium	51 FPS	27 FPS
high	41 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	16 FPS

Open Radeon RX 780 Open T1000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 780	T1000
1080p
low	345 FPS	170 FPS
medium	276 FPS	145 FPS
high	230 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	258 FPS	121 FPS
medium	207 FPS	99 FPS
high	172 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	160 FPS	73 FPS
medium	135 FPS	60 FPS
high	115 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	32 FPS

Open Radeon RX 780 Open T1000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 780	T1000
1080p
low	345 FPS	333 FPS
medium	276 FPS	275 FPS
high	230 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	258 FPS	243 FPS
medium	207 FPS	207 FPS
high	172 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	129 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	150 FPS
medium	138 FPS	137 FPS
high	115 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	66 FPS

Open Radeon RX 780 Open T1000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 780	T1000
1080p
low	323 FPS	179 FPS
medium	260 FPS	147 FPS
high	223 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	243 FPS	124 FPS
medium	203 FPS	103 FPS
high	170 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	144 FPS	73 FPS
medium	126 FPS	58 FPS
high	102 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	34 FPS

Open Radeon RX 780 Open T1000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and T1000

Radeon RX 780

The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

T1000

The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 1395 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	T1000
G3D Mark Score	7,658	7,649
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3840+329%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	35.87 TFLOPS+1335%	2.5 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2335 MHz+67%	1395 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+329%	56
L1 Cache	768 KB	896 KB+17%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The T1000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	T1000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	T1000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	T1000
DirectX	12 (12_2)	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).

Feature	Radeon RX 780	T1000
Encoder	RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the T1000's 50W — a 113% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	T1000
TDP	180W	50W-72%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	156mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	42.5	153.0+260%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the T1000 launched at $350. The T1000 costs 29.9% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the T1000 offers 43.1% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).