G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅133.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6800M

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Radeon RX 6800M

2021

Why buy it

✅133.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 12 GB).

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6800M better than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?

Yes. Radeon RX 6800M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 13,295 vs 13,130 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6800M is a 2021 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6800M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 7nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6800M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $599 MSRP. Radeon RX 6800M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 6800M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.3% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $599 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and FSR 3 + AFMF.

Is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon RX 6800M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR 3 + AFMF.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6800M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
1080p
low	211 FPS	175 FPS
medium	191 FPS	155 FPS
high	160 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	120 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	144 FPS
medium	158 FPS	117 FPS
high	115 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	97 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	87 FPS
medium	66 FPS	73 FPS
high	47 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	52 FPS

Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 6800M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
1080p
low	320 FPS	421 FPS
medium	269 FPS	353 FPS
high	212 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	168 FPS	245 FPS
1440p
low	212 FPS	272 FPS
medium	176 FPS	227 FPS
high	150 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	161 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	127 FPS
medium	81 FPS	109 FPS
high	68 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	69 FPS

Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 6800M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
1080p
low	591 FPS	598 FPS
medium	473 FPS	479 FPS
high	394 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	443 FPS	449 FPS
medium	355 FPS	359 FPS
high	295 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	222 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	295 FPS	299 FPS
medium	236 FPS	239 FPS
high	197 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	150 FPS

Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 6800M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
1080p
low	321 FPS	598 FPS
medium	279 FPS	479 FPS
high	243 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	237 FPS	449 FPS
medium	212 FPS	359 FPS
high	185 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	299 FPS
medium	125 FPS	239 FPS
high	101 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	150 FPS

Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 6800M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon RX 6800M

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon RX 6800M

The Radeon RX 6800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2116 MHz to 2390 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,295 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon RX 6800M reaches 13,295 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 6800M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6800M). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.24 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800M). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2390 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
G3D Mark Score	13,130	13,295+1%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2+40%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2	12.24 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	2390 MHz+59%
ROPs	64 ×2	64
TMUs	224 ×2+40%	160
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800M has 12 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 133.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6800M) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
VRAM Capacity	28 GB+133%	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800M).

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon RX 6800M's 145W — a 8.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon RX 6800M
TDP	158W	145W-8%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	83.1	91.7+10%