
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅600% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 80W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 158W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅600% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 158W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 80W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU better than Radeon RX 6600S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6600S make more sense than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 112 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon RX 6600S

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S
The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon RX 6600S reaches 13,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 6600S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130 | 13,016 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+50% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2000 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+100% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600S has 4 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 600% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB+600% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 80W — a 65.5% difference. The Radeon RX 6600S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W | 80W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1 | 162.7+96% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6600S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $400 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #592 | #200 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













