
Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅87.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌286.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 780
2024Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅87.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌286.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 780 better than Radeon RX 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and Radeon RX 5300

Radeon RX 780
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,658 | 7,606 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+173% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS+674% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz+42% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+173% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 780 is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the Radeon RX 5300 tops out at FSR Frame Generation.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 780 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 has 3 GB. The Radeon RX 780 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 180mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 76.1+79% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 74.1% less ($370 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) vs 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 285.6% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $129-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 59.0+286% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | Navi 14 |
| Release | September 11 2024 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #131 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












