G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 260W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌116.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 120W.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

2023

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 260W, a 140W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌116.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile better than Radeon PRO W7800?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile averages 2.8% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 27,048 vs 27,180 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the overall package: you are getting DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, plus much lower power draw (120W vs 260W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W7800 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,499 MSRP. GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and you are getting 2.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (27,048 vs 27,180). Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you lower power draw (120W vs 260W), and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Is Radeon PRO W7800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7800 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $2,499 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	204 FPS	225 FPS
medium	190 FPS	210 FPS
high	163 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	149 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	188 FPS	203 FPS
medium	159 FPS	171 FPS
high	128 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	138 FPS
medium	102 FPS	115 FPS
high	76 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7800

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	501 FPS	619 FPS
medium	438 FPS	508 FPS
high	353 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	329 FPS
1440p
low	383 FPS	450 FPS
medium	332 FPS	371 FPS
high	268 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	214 FPS	246 FPS
medium	187 FPS	206 FPS
high	159 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	151 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7800

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	884 FPS	918 FPS
medium	735 FPS	762 FPS
high	661 FPS	676 FPS
ultra	570 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	697 FPS	709 FPS
medium	577 FPS	583 FPS
high	508 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	474 FPS	497 FPS
medium	396 FPS	411 FPS
high	347 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	282 FPS	291 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7800

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	723 FPS	881 FPS
medium	655 FPS	732 FPS
high	573 FPS	671 FPS
ultra	528 FPS	583 FPS
1440p
low	581 FPS	692 FPS
medium	520 FPS	577 FPS
high	456 FPS	512 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	445 FPS
4K
low	400 FPS	472 FPS
medium	364 FPS	405 FPS
high	334 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	306 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7800

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.

Radeon PRO W7800

The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 27,048 and the Radeon PRO W7800 reaches 27,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 304 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
G3D Mark Score	27,048	27,180
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	9728+117%	4480
Compute (TFLOPS)	32.98 TFLOPS	45.25 TFLOPS+37%
Boost Clock	1695 MHz	2525 MHz+49%
ROPs	112	128+14%
TMUs	304+9%	280
L1 Cache	9.5 MB+375%	2 MB
L2 Cache	64 MB+967%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	76+9%	70

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	576 GB/s	576 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	64 MB+967%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile draws 120W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
TDP	120W-54%	260W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	Mobile	2x 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	225.4+116%	104.5