
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌125.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 70W.
- ❌23.6% longer card at 267mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 158W, a 88W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 267mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 158W, a 88W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 267mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌125.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 70W.
- ❌23.6% longer card at 267mm vs 216mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon PRO W7500

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130 | 13,298+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 12.19 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1700 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+100% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB+250% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 77.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 216mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1 | 190.0+129% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $429 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #592 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













