
A10G
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌482.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌23.6% longer card at 267mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,071 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 469.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 267mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
A10G
2021Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,071 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 469.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 267mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌482.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌23.6% longer card at 267mm vs 216mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is A10G better than Radeon PRO W7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7500 make more sense than A10G?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Radeon PRO W7500

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+2% | 13,298 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+414% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+159% | 12.19 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+157% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+1700% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+157% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 216mm |
| Height | 112mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 190.0+109% |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 82.8% less ($2071 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 474.1% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | A10G | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $429-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 31.0+474% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 33 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #182 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













