G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅75.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅75.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A4500 Embedded GPU better than Radeon PRO W6400?

Yes. RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 75.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 75.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W6400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W6400 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon PRO W6400 make more sense than RTX A4500 Embedded GPU?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (50W vs 80W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $229 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A4500 Embedded GPU. The trade-off is that RTX A4500 Embedded GPU currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark and 75.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon PRO W6400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon PRO W6400 Benchmark Check

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	107 FPS	96 FPS
medium	95 FPS	85 FPS
high	81 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	47 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	80 FPS
medium	80 FPS	70 FPS
high	67 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	32 FPS
medium	42 FPS	29 FPS
high	31 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	19 FPS

Open Radeon PRO W6400 Open RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	165 FPS	239 FPS
medium	130 FPS	190 FPS
high	97 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	108 FPS	171 FPS
medium	85 FPS	130 FPS
high	64 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	56 FPS	86 FPS
medium	44 FPS	67 FPS
high	35 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	46 FPS

Open Radeon PRO W6400 Open RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	333 FPS	382 FPS
medium	292 FPS	305 FPS
high	212 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	191 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	286 FPS
medium	211 FPS	229 FPS
high	158 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	143 FPS
4K
low	137 FPS	191 FPS
medium	124 FPS	153 FPS
high	85 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	95 FPS

Open Radeon PRO W6400 Open RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	285 FPS	163 FPS
medium	206 FPS	134 FPS
high	180 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	210 FPS	118 FPS
medium	149 FPS	100 FPS
high	132 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	72 FPS
medium	76 FPS	59 FPS
high	67 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	36 FPS

Open Radeon PRO W6400 Open RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6400 and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU reaches 8,485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1215 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 46 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs 184.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	8,428	8,485
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	6 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	768	5888+667%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.58 TFLOPS	14.31 TFLOPS+300%
Boost Clock	2331 MHz+92%	1215 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	48	184+283%
L1 Cache	0.25 MB	5.8 MB+2220%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%
Ray Tracing Cores	12	46+283%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Encoder	VCN 3.0	NVENC 8.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	PureVideo HD VP11
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
TDP	50W-38%	80W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	69mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	168.6+59%	106.1