
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅67.1% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌554.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 350W vs 50W.
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Radeon PRO W6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 564.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 350W, a 300W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Radeon PRO W6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅67.1% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 564.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 350W, a 300W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌554.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 350W vs 50W.
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6400 better than Radeon Pro Duo?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Duo still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and Radeon PRO W6400

Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon PRO W6400
Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2331 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,299 | 8,428+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+433% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+129% | 3.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2331 MHz+133% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+433% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Duo comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 150% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 50W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.7 | 168.6+611% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 84.7% less ($1270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon PRO W6400 offers 569.1% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $229-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 36.8+569% |
| Codename | Capsaicin | Navi 24 |
| Release | April 26 2016 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #309 | #308 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












