
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 80W.
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 350W, a 270W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Duo
2016RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 350W, a 270W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4500 Embedded GPU better than Radeon Pro Duo?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Duo still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 46 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 382 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU reaches 8,485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,299 | 8,485+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2 | 5888+44% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 | 14.31 TFLOPS+75% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1215 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+39% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 5.8 MB+480% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Duo comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 125.6% difference. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 80W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 23.7 | 106.1+348% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | — |
| Codename | Capsaicin | GA104 |
| Release | April 26 2016 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #309 | #307 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












