
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌554.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 350W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 350W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌554.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 480 better than Radeon Pro Duo?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro Duo make more sense than Radeon RX 480?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and Radeon RX 480

Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,299 | 8,546+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+78% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+40% | 5.834 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1266 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+78% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+79% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 80% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 150W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.7 | 57.0+141% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 84.7% less ($1270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 578.2% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $229-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 37.3+578% |
| Codename | Capsaicin | Ellesmere |
| Release | April 26 2016 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #309 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












