
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X / 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅29.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 275mm, a 35mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌173% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌27.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 275W.
Radeon R9 290X / 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 275W instead of 350W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌14.6% longer card at 275mm vs 240mm.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Radeon R9 290X / 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅29.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 275mm, a 35mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 275W instead of 350W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌173% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌27.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 275W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌14.6% longer card at 275mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Duo better than Radeon R9 290X / 390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290X / 390X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and Radeon R9 290X / 390X

Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon R9 290X / 390X
Radeon R9 290X / 390X
The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,380 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the Radeon R9 290X / 390X reaches 8,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,299 | 8,380 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+45% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+39% | 5.914 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+45% | 176 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+45% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Duo comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the Radeon R9 290X / 390X's 275W — a 24% difference. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 275W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-21% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.7 | 30.5+29% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X launched at $549. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X costs 63.4% less ($950 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the Radeon R9 290X / 390X offers 178.2% better value. The Radeon Pro Duo is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $549-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 15.3+178% |
| Codename | Capsaicin | Grenada |
| Release | April 26 2016 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #309 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












