
Radeon PRO W6400
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 110W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 180mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌27.9% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 110W vs 50W.
Radeon PRO W6400
2022Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 110W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 180mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌27.9% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 110W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500 better than Radeon PRO W6400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6400 make more sense than Radeon RX 5500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6400 and Radeon RX 5500

Radeon PRO W6400
Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,428 | 8,837+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1408+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.58 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 2331 MHz+26% | 1845 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 88+83% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 75% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 180mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-55% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 180mm |
| Height | 69mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.6+110% | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 21.8% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 34.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | $179-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8 | 49.4+34% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 19 2022 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #308 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












