
A10G
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$2,200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($2,200 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
A10G
2021Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($2,200 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌13.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$2,200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is A10G better than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Radeon Pro Vega 64X

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X reaches 13,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+2% | 13,369 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+125% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+162% | 12.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+16% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+13% | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+800% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The A10G offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 50% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+70% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X costs 12% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X offers 13% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $2200-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 6.1+13% |
| Codename | GA102 | Vega 10 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #182 | #190 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













