Core 5 220H vs Core i5-13600K

Intel

Core 5 220H

12 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2024

Popular choices:

i5-13600K
VS
Intel

Core i5-13600K

14 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 220H

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 37,655).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core 5 220H?
Yes. Core i5-13600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 13.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 77.7% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 13.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 77.7% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 13.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 220H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 5 220HCore i5-13600K
1080p
low277 FPS281 FPS
medium249 FPS264 FPS
high210 FPS220 FPS
ultra181 FPS188 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS235 FPS
medium186 FPS198 FPS
high152 FPS158 FPS
ultra134 FPS138 FPS
4K
low161 FPS159 FPS
medium131 FPS133 FPS
high101 FPS102 FPS
ultra88 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 5 220HCore i5-13600K
1080p
low530 FPS632 FPS
medium521 FPS533 FPS
high427 FPS450 FPS
ultra385 FPS416 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS540 FPS
medium449 FPS474 FPS
high376 FPS403 FPS
ultra323 FPS351 FPS
4K
low330 FPS316 FPS
medium279 FPS282 FPS
high256 FPS269 FPS
ultra225 FPS238 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 5 220HCore i5-13600K
1080p
low530 FPS663 FPS
medium530 FPS543 FPS
high530 FPS477 FPS
ultra530 FPS414 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS600 FPS
medium530 FPS499 FPS
high530 FPS434 FPS
ultra496 FPS376 FPS
4K
low530 FPS441 FPS
medium492 FPS381 FPS
high439 FPS344 FPS
ultra370 FPS295 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 5 220HCore i5-13600K
1080p
low530 FPS941 FPS
medium530 FPS941 FPS
high530 FPS923 FPS
ultra530 FPS831 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS941 FPS
medium530 FPS850 FPS
high530 FPS738 FPS
ultra530 FPS651 FPS
4K
low530 FPS651 FPS
medium530 FPS588 FPS
high500 FPS529 FPS
ultra431 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i5-13600K

Intel

Core 5 220H

The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Intel

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Processing Power

The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 56% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i5-13600K
Cores / Threads
12 / 16
14 / 20+17%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
24 MB+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark
21,192
37,655+78%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i5-13600K
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i5-13600K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop