
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 25,029).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+18.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 220H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core 5 220H
2024Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+18.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 220H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 25,029).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 220H better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 246 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i5-13400F

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core 5 220H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 16.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+20% | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+7% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+11% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 25,029+18% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












