
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 220H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,192).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core 5 220H
2024Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 220H.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,192).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 220H better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 196 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 473 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i5-12400F

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 220H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 8.2% lead for the Core 5 220H. Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 21,192+8% | 19,532 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Gaming Performance/Value |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












