
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,143 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 and the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU reaches 10,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,119 | 10,143 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2304+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+123% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz+1% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 72+13% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.3 MB+130% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+71% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+100% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU's 70W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-29% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 202.4+40% | 144.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











