
GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌51.5% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 18.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.9 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.9 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌51.5% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 18.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 645 better than Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE make more sense than GeForce GTX 645?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE

GeForce GTX 645
GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.


Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE
The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,872 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE reaches 1,872 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE uses Vega, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,872 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 512+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.843 TFLOPS+115% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 645 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 645 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 124.8+1228% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE launched at $99. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE costs 34% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 18.9 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE) — the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE offers 51.2% better value. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $99-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 18.9+51% |
| Codename | GF100 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | May 31 2010 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #618 | #721 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














