
GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7700-serie
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 7700-serie
2012Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌6% HIGHER MSRP$159 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Radeon HD 7700-serie
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌6% HIGHER MSRP$159 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7700-serie better than GeForce GTX 645?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 645 make more sense than Radeon HD 7700-serie?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Radeon HD 7700-serie

GeForce GTX 645
GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon HD 7700-serie
Radeon HD 7700-serie
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon HD 7700-serie reaches 1,899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 7700-serie uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,899+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 2048+482% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+343% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 44 | 128+191% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+38% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 645 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7700-serie relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 645 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 7700-serie's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4+24% | 7.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 5.7% less ($9 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 11.9 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 5% better value. The Radeon HD 7700-serie is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-6% | $159 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+5% | 11.9 |
| Codename | GF100 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 31 2010 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #618 | #431 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













