
GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4130
2017Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 645
2010Radeon Pro WX 4130
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 4130 better than GeForce GTX 645?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 645 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4130?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Radeon Pro WX 4130

GeForce GTX 645
GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,890 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 640+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.348 TFLOPS+58% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+10% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+340% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 645 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 37.8+302% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 50% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 6.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 98.4% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+98% | 6.3 |
| Codename | GF100 | Baffin |
| Release | May 31 2010 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #618 | #697 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













