GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

2010Core: 607 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4130

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 645

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 98.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4130

2017

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 4130 better than GeForce GTX 645?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,880 vs 1,890 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (50W vs 200W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 645 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro WX 4130 is about 100.0% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 0.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 645 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GeForce GTX 645 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4130?
Yes. GeForce GTX 645 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $150 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 4130. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 4130 currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 645 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
1080p
low66 FPS39 FPS
medium54 FPS25 FPS
high38 FPS18 FPS
ultra26 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low52 FPS27 FPS
medium43 FPS17 FPS
high27 FPS9 FPS
ultra18 FPS5 FPS
4K
low20 FPS9 FPS
medium19 FPS6 FPS
high12 FPS4 FPS
ultra10 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
1080p
low85 FPS66 FPS
medium62 FPS37 FPS
high50 FPS26 FPS
ultra38 FPS16 FPS
1440p
low49 FPS31 FPS
medium33 FPS20 FPS
high23 FPS12 FPS
ultra18 FPS9 FPS
4K
low23 FPS9 FPS
medium16 FPS6 FPS
high12 FPS5 FPS
ultra9 FPS3 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
1080p
low85 FPS85 FPS
medium68 FPS68 FPS
high56 FPS57 FPS
ultra42 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low63 FPS64 FPS
medium51 FPS51 FPS
high42 FPS43 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
4K
low42 FPS43 FPS
medium34 FPS34 FPS
high28 FPS28 FPS
ultra21 FPS21 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
1080p
low85 FPS85 FPS
medium68 FPS68 FPS
high56 FPS57 FPS
ultra42 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low63 FPS64 FPS
medium51 FPS51 FPS
high42 FPS43 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
4K
low42 FPS43 FPS
medium34 FPS34 FPS
high28 FPS28 FPS
ultra21 FPS21 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Radeon Pro WX 4130

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4130

The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130).

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
G3D Mark Score
1,880
1,890
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
352
640+82%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS
1.348 TFLOPS+58%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
44+10%
40
L1 Cache
704 KB+340%
160 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 645 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
DirectX
11.0
12 (12_0)+9%
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130).

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo VP5
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
TDP
200W
50W-75%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
147mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
9.4
37.8+302%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 50% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 6.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 98.4% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP
$150-50%
$300
Performance per Dollar
12.5+98%
6.3
Codename
GF100
Baffin
Release
May 31 2010
March 1 2017
Ranking
#618
#697