
GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics 770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Intel UHD Graphics 770
2022Why buy it
- β Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 645: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 645 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 12.2 (2022β2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2022-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 645
2010Intel UHD Graphics 770
2022Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- β Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 645: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 645 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 12.2 (2022β2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2022-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Intel UHD Graphics 770 better than GeForce GTX 645?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 645 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 22 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 22 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Intel UHD Graphics 770

GeForce GTX 645
GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Intel UHD Graphics 770
Intel UHD Graphics 770
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 27 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,914 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Intel UHD Graphics 770 reaches 1,914 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 uses Generation 12.2, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 770). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 770).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,914+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 12.2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 352+38% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS+1% | 0.8448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 44+175% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 645 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 645 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 770's 15W β a 172.1% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 770). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 147mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 127.6+1257% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 launched at $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 770) β the Intel UHD Graphics 770 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | Raptor Lake GT1 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | September 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #618 | #644 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













