
GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon RX 7500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌52.7% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 645
2010Radeon RX 7500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌52.7% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 645 better than Radeon RX 7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7500 make more sense than GeForce GTX 645?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Radeon RX 7500

GeForce GTX 645
GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon RX 7500
Radeon RX 7500
The Radeon RX 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,873 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon RX 7500 reaches 1,873 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX 7500 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 7500). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,873 |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 2304+555% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+1220% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 44 | 144+227% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+38% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 645 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 645 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7500 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 645 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 7500) — the Radeon RX 7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 216 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 7500's 175W — a 13.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 350W (Radeon RX 7500). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 175W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 10.7+14% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7500 launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 34.5% less ($79 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 8.2 (Radeon RX 7500) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 52.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-34% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+52% | 8.2 |
| Codename | GF100 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #618 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













