
GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 147mm instead of 242mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,880 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1079.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 254.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌64.6% longer card at 242mm vs 147mm.
GeForce GTX 645
2010GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 147mm instead of 242mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+1079.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 254.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,880 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌64.6% longer card at 242mm vs 147mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX 645?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 645 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX 645
GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1079.4%. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 22,172+1079% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 5888+1573% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+2274% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 44 | 184+318% |
| L1 Cache | 0.69 MB | 5.8 MB+741% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 645 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 Ultimate+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 147mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-9% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 147mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 100.8+972% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 69.9% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 255.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-70% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 44.4+255% |
| Codename | GF100 | GA104 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #618 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













