PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9655P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,173 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Draws 400W instead of 500W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 29,300).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (384 MB vs 512 MB).

EPYC 9755

2024

Why buy it

✅+20.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($12,984 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 500W vs 400W.

EPYC 9655P

2024

EPYC 9755

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,173 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Draws 400W instead of 500W, a 100W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+20.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 29,300).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (384 MB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($12,984 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 500W vs 400W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655P better than EPYC 9755?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 9655P is ahead with a 11.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9755 pulls ahead with 20.6% better Geekbench multi-core. EPYC 9755 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9755 is the better fit. You are getting 20.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9655P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9655P is $2,173 cheaper on MSRP at $10,811 MSRP versus $12,984 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9755 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 20.6% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 15.9% better value on MSRP (14.8 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9755 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 128 cores / 256 threads instead of 96/192. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9655P Benchmark Check

EPYC 9755 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9655P	EPYC 9755
1080p
low	170 FPS	170 FPS
medium	143 FPS	141 FPS
high	122 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	148 FPS
medium	121 FPS	119 FPS
high	99 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	69 FPS
medium	73 FPS	59 FPS
high	57 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	38 FPS

Open EPYC 9655P Open EPYC 9755

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9655P	EPYC 9755
1080p
low	696 FPS	581 FPS
medium	602 FPS	510 FPS
high	475 FPS	414 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	361 FPS
1440p
low	566 FPS	489 FPS
medium	501 FPS	437 FPS
high	414 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	302 FPS
4K
low	331 FPS	304 FPS
medium	295 FPS	275 FPS
high	267 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	221 FPS

Open EPYC 9655P Open EPYC 9755

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9655P	EPYC 9755
1080p
low	746 FPS	741 FPS
medium	633 FPS	632 FPS
high	589 FPS	574 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	505 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	558 FPS
medium	474 FPS	473 FPS
high	434 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	366 FPS
4K
low	411 FPS	403 FPS
medium	331 FPS	324 FPS
high	299 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 9655P Open EPYC 9755

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9655P	EPYC 9755
1080p
low	1047 FPS	915 FPS
medium	939 FPS	830 FPS
high	821 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	744 FPS	632 FPS
1440p
low	839 FPS	726 FPS
medium	733 FPS	633 FPS
high	641 FPS	542 FPS
ultra	562 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	605 FPS	524 FPS
medium	539 FPS	468 FPS
high	477 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	352 FPS

Open EPYC 9655P Open EPYC 9755

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655P and EPYC 9755

EPYC 9655P

The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

EPYC 9755

The EPYC 9755 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 166,328 points. Launch price was $12,984.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9655P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9755 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9755 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9755 — a 9.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655P (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the EPYC 9755's 166,328 — a 3.6% lead for the EPYC 9755. Multi-core Geekbench: 24,287 vs 29,300 (18.7% advantage for the EPYC 9755). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9755.

Feature	EPYC 9655P	EPYC 9755
Cores / Threads	96 / 192	128 / 256+33%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+10%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)	512 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	160,490	166,328+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	24,287	29,300+21%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9755 supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and SP5 (EPYC 9755).

Feature	EPYC 9655P	EPYC 9755
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	9 TB+50%
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9755 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9755 rivals Xeon 6980P.

Feature	EPYC 9655P	EPYC 9755
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Data Center / Cloud Computing

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9655P launched at $10811 MSRP, while the EPYC 9755 debuted at $12984. On MSRP ($10811 vs $12984), the EPYC 9655P is $2173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9755 — making the EPYC 9655P the 14.7% better value option.