EPYC 9334 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9334

32 Cores64 Thrd210 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 Cores104 Thrd300 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9334

32 / 64

65,568

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 / 104

68,385

+4.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 210W instead of 300W, a 90W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8571N across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 68,385).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $2,391 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 420.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌42.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 210W.

EPYC 9334

2022

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 210W instead of 300W, a 90W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $2,391 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 420.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8571N across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 68,385).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌42.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 210W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than EPYC 9334?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 32.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better fit. You are getting 4.3% better PassMark, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the smarter buy today. Xeon Platinum 8571N is $2,391 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 420.6% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 52 cores / 104 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9334 Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8571N Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	170 FPS	188 FPS
medium	141 FPS	165 FPS
high	122 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	155 FPS
medium	120 FPS	131 FPS
high	97 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	70 FPS
medium	59 FPS	63 FPS
high	47 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	533 FPS	515 FPS
medium	465 FPS	456 FPS
high	373 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	303 FPS	306 FPS
1440p
low	438 FPS	421 FPS
medium	392 FPS	379 FPS
high	323 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	259 FPS
medium	246 FPS	237 FPS
high	216 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	174 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	646 FPS	910 FPS
medium	538 FPS	838 FPS
high	501 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	436 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	502 FPS	782 FPS
medium	417 FPS	716 FPS
high	382 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	374 FPS	528 FPS
medium	291 FPS	444 FPS
high	260 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	208 FPS	330 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	856 FPS	1036 FPS
medium	786 FPS	917 FPS
high	678 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	598 FPS	674 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	849 FPS
medium	605 FPS	727 FPS
high	518 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	443 FPS	528 FPS
4K
low	494 FPS	617 FPS
medium	445 FPS	541 FPS
high	391 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	404 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9334 and Xeon Platinum 8571N

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 4.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	52 / 104+63%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+13%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+134%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	65,568	68,385+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	60,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9334 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the EPYC 9334 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the EPYC 9334 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+95900%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144	4096 GB+69904967%
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9334 launched at $2990 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N debuted at $599. On MSRP ($2990 vs $599), the Xeon Platinum 8571N is $2391 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 135.5% better value option.