
EPYC 9334
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9334
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 350W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 67,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,561 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 618.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 210W.
EPYC 9334
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 350W, a 140W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,561 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 618.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 67,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 210W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than EPYC 9334?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 786 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 230 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 502 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 786 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 678 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 518 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9334 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334
The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 65,568 | 67,561+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,596 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9334 versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 9334 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 2048 GB+34952433% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9334) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9334 launched at $2990 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($2990 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $2561 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 151.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2990 | $429-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 157.5+619% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












