PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 66,614).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.0% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $591 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 9334

2022

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.0% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $591 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 66,614).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than EPYC 9334?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 34.0% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 34.0% more average FPS across 34 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $591 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it gives you a 34.0% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.6% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9334 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9334 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9334	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	170 FPS	224 FPS
medium	141 FPS	184 FPS
high	122 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	194 FPS
medium	120 FPS	156 FPS
high	97 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	94 FPS
medium	59 FPS	81 FPS
high	47 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	51 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9334	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	533 FPS	806 FPS
medium	465 FPS	684 FPS
high	373 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	303 FPS	464 FPS
1440p
low	438 FPS	655 FPS
medium	392 FPS	569 FPS
high	323 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	383 FPS
medium	246 FPS	335 FPS
high	216 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	265 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9334	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	646 FPS	812 FPS
medium	538 FPS	680 FPS
high	501 FPS	620 FPS
ultra	436 FPS	540 FPS
1440p
low	502 FPS	622 FPS
medium	417 FPS	521 FPS
high	382 FPS	470 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	405 FPS
4K
low	374 FPS	451 FPS
medium	291 FPS	360 FPS
high	260 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	208 FPS	259 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9334	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	856 FPS	1215 FPS
medium	786 FPS	1015 FPS
high	678 FPS	926 FPS
ultra	598 FPS	820 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	951 FPS
medium	605 FPS	828 FPS
high	518 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	443 FPS	611 FPS
4K
low	494 FPS	674 FPS
medium	445 FPS	605 FPS
high	391 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9334 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.5 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	128 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	65,568	66,614+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	45,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,550
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9334 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 9334 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).

Feature	EPYC 9334	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Socket	SP5	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+119900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144	2048 GB+34952433%
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9334) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9334 launched at $2990 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. On MSRP ($2990 vs $2399), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $591 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 23.5% better value option.