
EPYC 9334
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9334
2022Why buy it
- ✅+91.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 210W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,541 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 248.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 210W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9334 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 65,568).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9334
2022Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+91.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,541 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 248.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 210W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9334 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 210W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 65,568).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 9334?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 502 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 786 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 678 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 518 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9334 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334
The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 62.6% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz+63% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+33% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 65,568+91% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9334 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the EPYC 9334 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9334 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 128 GB+2184433% |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9334) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9334 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9334 launched at $2990 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($2990 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $2541 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 110.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2990 | $449-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 76.4+249% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












