PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅+146.4% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,691 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 305.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 65,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9334

2022

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅+146.4% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,691 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 305.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 65,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than EPYC 9334?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9334 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9334 is the better fit. You are getting 146.4% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $2,691 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9334 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 146.4% better PassMark. It is also 305.8% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9334 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9334 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9334	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	170 FPS	156 FPS
medium	141 FPS	129 FPS
high	122 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	137 FPS
medium	120 FPS	111 FPS
high	97 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	77 FPS
medium	59 FPS	67 FPS
high	47 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	43 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9334	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	533 FPS	649 FPS
medium	465 FPS	549 FPS
high	373 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	303 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	438 FPS	552 FPS
medium	392 FPS	484 FPS
high	323 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	350 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	343 FPS
medium	246 FPS	303 FPS
high	216 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	245 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9334	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	646 FPS	665 FPS
medium	538 FPS	557 FPS
high	501 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	436 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	502 FPS	554 FPS
medium	417 FPS	458 FPS
high	382 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	358 FPS
4K
low	374 FPS	402 FPS
medium	291 FPS	322 FPS
high	260 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	208 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Ryzen 7 5700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9334	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	856 FPS	665 FPS
medium	786 FPS	665 FPS
high	678 FPS	665 FPS
ultra	598 FPS	665 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	665 FPS
medium	605 FPS	665 FPS
high	518 FPS	607 FPS
ultra	443 FPS	533 FPS
4K
low	494 FPS	545 FPS
medium	445 FPS	488 FPS
high	391 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	385 FPS

Open EPYC 9334 Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9334 and Ryzen 7 5700X

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 84.5% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.4 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+300%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	65,568+146%	26,609
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	14,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9334 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 9334 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 9334 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).

Feature	EPYC 9334	Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+119900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144	128 GB+2184433%
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9334) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Ryzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9334 launched at $2990 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($2990 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $2691 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 120.9% better value option.