
EPYC 9334
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9334
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,791 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 393.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 9334.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9334 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 65,568).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9334
2022Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,791 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 393.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 9334.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9334 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 65,568).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9334 better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 502 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 786 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 678 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 518 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9334 and Ryzen 5 5600

EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334
The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 101.1% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+300% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 65,568+204% | 21,550 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9334 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the EPYC 9334 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the EPYC 9334 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 128 GB+2184433% |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9334) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9334 launched at $2990 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($2990 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $2791 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 132.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2990 | $199-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 108.3+395% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












