
EPYC 75F3
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 75F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+127.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,084 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 690.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 75F3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 64,505).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 75F3, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 75F3
2021Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+127.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,084 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 690.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 75F3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 64,505).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 75F3, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than EPYC 75F3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 75F3 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 75F3 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 75F3 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 948 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 792 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 734 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 657 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 661 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 552 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 75F3 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1006 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 908 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 782 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 679 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 770 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 671 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 575 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 28% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 2.95 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 77.9% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.3 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 2.95 GHz | 4.7 GHz+59% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 6 MB+1100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 64,505+128% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X — the EPYC 75F3 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 128 GB+3276700% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 75F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($5383 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $5084 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 155.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383 | $299-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0 | 94.7+689% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












