PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,874 less on MSRP ($5,383 MSRP vs $10,257 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $10,257 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.

EPYC 7543

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 75F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (62,952 vs 64,505).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($10,257 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).

EPYC 75F3

2021

EPYC 7543

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,874 less on MSRP ($5,383 MSRP vs $10,257 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $10,257 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 75F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (62,952 vs 64,505).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($10,257 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 75F3 better than EPYC 7543?

Yes. EPYC 75F3 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 5.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 75F3 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 75F3 is the better fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 75F3 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 75F3 is $4,874 cheaper on MSRP at $5,383 MSRP versus $10,257 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 95.2% better value on MSRP (12.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 75F3 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 75F3 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7543 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7543
1080p
low	198 FPS	198 FPS
medium	161 FPS	161 FPS
high	130 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	161 FPS
medium	126 FPS	126 FPS
high	98 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	73 FPS
medium	61 FPS	61 FPS
high	47 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 7543

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7543
1080p
low	507 FPS	507 FPS
medium	443 FPS	443 FPS
high	354 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	288 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	417 FPS
medium	373 FPS	373 FPS
high	308 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	243 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	257 FPS
medium	234 FPS	234 FPS
high	205 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	171 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 7543

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7543
1080p
low	948 FPS	850 FPS
medium	792 FPS	705 FPS
high	734 FPS	657 FPS
ultra	657 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	661 FPS	612 FPS
medium	552 FPS	506 FPS
high	503 FPS	464 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	405 FPS
4K
low	472 FPS	437 FPS
medium	374 FPS	339 FPS
high	330 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	245 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 7543

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7543
1080p
low	1006 FPS	992 FPS
medium	908 FPS	900 FPS
high	782 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	679 FPS	671 FPS
1440p
low	770 FPS	763 FPS
medium	671 FPS	665 FPS
high	575 FPS	569 FPS
ultra	500 FPS	490 FPS
4K
low	556 FPS	547 FPS
medium	495 FPS	488 FPS
high	435 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	370 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 7543

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7543

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

EPYC 7543

The EPYC 7543 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,952 points. Launch price was $3,761.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7543 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 75F3 (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm+ process. In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 7543's 62,952 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 75F3. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7543
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	4 GHz+8%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.95 GHz+5%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm+
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	64,505+2%	62,952

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and SP3 (EPYC 7543).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7543
Socket	SP3	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7543 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7543
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the EPYC 7543 debuted at $10257. On MSRP ($5383 vs $10257), the EPYC 75F3 is $4874 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 7543 — making the EPYC 75F3 the 64.5% better value option.