
EPYC 4584PX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,218 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 60,169).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4584PX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,218 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 60,169).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4584PX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 1166 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 1102 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 972 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 806 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1303 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 993 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 865 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1035 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 5600X

EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 4584PX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 21.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 93.5% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+24% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+14% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+300% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 60,169+175% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the EPYC 4584PX supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4584PX supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the EPYC 4584PX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+129900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 128 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4584PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($1517 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $1218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 59.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517 | $299-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | 73.1+84% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












