
EPYC 4545P
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-2575X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,140 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 31.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2575X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon w7-2575X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (52,951 vs 54,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.4 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($1,689 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4545P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4545P
2025Xeon w7-2575X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,140 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 31.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2575X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (52,951 vs 54,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.4 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($1,689 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4545P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4545P better than Xeon w7-2575X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 233 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 1252 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 1143 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 961 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 864 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 425 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1072 FPS | 1252 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 951 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 827 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 842 FPS | 969 FPS |
| medium | 747 FPS | 835 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4545P and Xeon w7-2575X

EPYC 4545P
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon w7-2575X
Xeon w7-2575X
The Xeon w7-2575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,951 points. Launch price was $1,689.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4545P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-2575X offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon w7-2575X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2575X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-2575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Xeon w7-2575X's 52,951 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 4545P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P vs 45 MB on the Xeon w7-2575X.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 22 / 44+38% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+42% | 45 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 54,255+2% | 52,951 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,640 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-2575X — the EPYC 4545P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-2575X supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2575X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2575X) — the Xeon w7-2575X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-2575X).
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 2048 GB+1118480967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs true (Xeon w7-2575X). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w7-2575X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon w7-2575X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4545P launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-2575X debuted at $1689. On MSRP ($549 vs $1689), the EPYC 4545P is $1140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4545P delivers 98.8 pts/$ vs 31.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2575X — making the EPYC 4545P the 103.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-67% | $1689 |
| Performance per Dollar | 98.8+215% | 31.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













