
EPYC 4545P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,255 vs 55,711).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 9955HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 4545P
2025Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+2.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,255 vs 55,711).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 9955HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX better than EPYC 4545P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1072 FPS | 1071 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 759 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 842 FPS | 840 FPS |
| medium | 747 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 420 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4545P and Ryzen 9 9955HX

EPYC 4545P
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 9 9955HX
Ryzen 9 9955HX
The Ryzen 9 9955HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,711 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4545P and Ryzen 9 9955HX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX's 55,711 — a 2.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+20% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 54,255 | 55,711+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,010 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,219 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,563 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX — the EPYC 4545P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4545P supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 96 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX).
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 96 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs true (Ryzen 9 9955HX). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4545P) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9955HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 9 9955HX rivals Core Ultra 9 275HX.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












