EPYC 4545P vs Xeon Platinum 8358

AMD

EPYC 4545P

16 Cores32 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8358

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4545P

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
  • Costs $4,058 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
  • Delivers 736.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (54,255 vs 54,416).

Xeon Platinum 8358

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • 128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($4,607 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • 284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4545P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4545P better than Xeon Platinum 8358?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 4545P is ahead with a 33.2% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8358 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. EPYC 4545P also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8358 is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4545P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 4545P is $4,058 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $4,607 MSRP, and it gives you a 33.2% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8358 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 736.7% better value on MSRP (98.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4545P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 4545PXeon Platinum 8358
1080p
low286 FPS185 FPS
medium262 FPS149 FPS
high215 FPS120 FPS
ultra181 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low262 FPS154 FPS
medium218 FPS120 FPS
high167 FPS93 FPS
ultra148 FPS74 FPS
4K
low182 FPS72 FPS
medium151 FPS60 FPS
high115 FPS46 FPS
ultra102 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 4545PXeon Platinum 8358
1080p
low674 FPS416 FPS
medium580 FPS364 FPS
high434 FPS296 FPS
ultra375 FPS237 FPS
1440p
low567 FPS356 FPS
medium506 FPS317 FPS
high392 FPS264 FPS
ultra312 FPS203 FPS
4K
low320 FPS221 FPS
medium289 FPS200 FPS
high255 FPS169 FPS
ultra219 FPS136 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 4545PXeon Platinum 8358
1080p
low850 FPS984 FPS
medium679 FPS858 FPS
high601 FPS811 FPS
ultra515 FPS720 FPS
1440p
low679 FPS787 FPS
medium543 FPS676 FPS
high469 FPS639 FPS
ultra398 FPS567 FPS
4K
low484 FPS504 FPS
medium401 FPS397 FPS
high360 FPS353 FPS
ultra302 FPS288 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 4545PXeon Platinum 8358
1080p
low1072 FPS911 FPS
medium966 FPS828 FPS
high843 FPS714 FPS
ultra760 FPS615 FPS
1440p
low842 FPS712 FPS
medium747 FPS625 FPS
high652 FPS537 FPS
ultra566 FPS460 FPS
4K
low619 FPS514 FPS
medium553 FPS459 FPS
high487 FPS403 FPS
ultra421 FPS351 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4545P and Xeon Platinum 8358

AMD

EPYC 4545P

The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8358

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4545P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — a 45.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Xeon Platinum 8358's 54,416 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8358. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358.

FeatureEPYC 4545PXeon Platinum 8358
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+59%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+15%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+33%
48 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-60%
10 nm
Architecture
Grado (2025)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
54,255
54,416
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — the EPYC 4545P supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8358). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) — the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358).

FeatureEPYC 4545PXeon Platinum 8358
Socket
AM5
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5600+75%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
192
4096+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
64+129%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4545P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8358). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureEPYC 4545PXeon Platinum 8358
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4545P launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 debuted at $4607. On MSRP ($549 vs $4607), the EPYC 4545P is $4058 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4545P delivers 98.8 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8358 — making the EPYC 4545P the 157.3% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4545PXeon Platinum 8358
MSRP
$549-88%
$4607
Performance per Dollar
98.8+737%
11.8
Release Date
2025
2021