
EPYC 4545P
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8358
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,058 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 736.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,255 vs 54,416).
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($4,607 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4545P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
EPYC 4545P
2025Xeon Platinum 8358
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,058 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 736.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,255 vs 54,416).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($4,607 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4545P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4545P better than Xeon Platinum 8358?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 984 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 858 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 811 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 720 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 787 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1072 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 828 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 615 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 842 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 747 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4545P and Xeon Platinum 8358

EPYC 4545P
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358
The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4545P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — a 45.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Xeon Platinum 8358's 54,416 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8358. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+59% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+15% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+33% | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 54,255 | 54,416 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — the EPYC 4545P supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8358). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) — the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358).
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4545P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8358). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4545P launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 debuted at $4607. On MSRP ($549 vs $4607), the EPYC 4545P is $4058 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4545P delivers 98.8 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8358 — making the EPYC 4545P the 157.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Platinum 8358 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-88% | $4607 |
| Performance per Dollar | 98.8+737% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













