
EPYC 4545P
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,255 vs 55,025).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4545P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 4545P
2025Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,255 vs 55,025).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4545P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than EPYC 4545P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 609 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 300 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1072 FPS | 1050 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 947 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 827 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 745 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 842 FPS | 834 FPS |
| medium | 747 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 648 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4545P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395

EPYC 4545P
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4545P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 54,255 | 55,025+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 35.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4545P supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the EPYC 4545P offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600 | 8000+43% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192+50% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+75% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4545P) and AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4545P launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($549 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is $549 cheaper.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 98.8 | — |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












