
EPYC 4545P
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6430
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,579 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,128 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 24.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,128 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6430 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6430
2023Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (53,066 vs 54,255).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($2,128 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4545P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4545P
2025Xeon Gold 6430
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,579 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,128 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 24.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,128 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6430 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (53,066 vs 54,255).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($2,128 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4545P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4545P better than Xeon Gold 6430?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 717 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 607 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1072 FPS | 1074 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 950 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 811 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 671 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 842 FPS | 878 FPS |
| medium | 747 FPS | 756 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 531 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 410 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4545P and Xeon Gold 6430

EPYC 4545P
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 6430
Xeon Gold 6430
The Xeon Gold 6430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 53,066 points. Launch price was $2,138.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4545P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6430 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6430 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6430 — a 45.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6430 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Xeon Gold 6430's 53,066 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 4545P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+59% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+43% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+7% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 54,255+2% | 53,066 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6430 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus 4400 on the Xeon Gold 6430 — the EPYC 4545P supports 24% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6430 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6430). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6430) — the Xeon Gold 6430 offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6430).
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6430 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+27% | 4400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4545P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6430). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6430 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Gold 6430 rivals EPYC 9334.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6430 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4545P launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6430 debuted at $2128. On MSRP ($549 vs $2128), the EPYC 4545P is $1579 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4545P delivers 98.8 pts/$ vs 24.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6430 — making the EPYC 4545P the 119.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-74% | $2128 |
| Performance per Dollar | 98.8+297% | 24.9 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













