Core 5 220H vs Xeon E5-2697 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 220H

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 145W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon E5-2697 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,990 vs 21,192).
❌222.2% higher power demand at 145W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Core 5 220H

2024

Xeon E5-2697 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 145W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,990 vs 21,192).
❌222.2% higher power demand at 145W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 5 220H better than Xeon E5-2697 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2697 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 5 220H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 5 220H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 220H is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 5 220H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core 5 220H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 18.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 5 220H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 5 220H Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2697 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core 5 220H	Xeon E5-2697 v4
1080p
low	277 FPS	182 FPS
medium	249 FPS	158 FPS
high	210 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	101 FPS
1440p
low	230 FPS	152 FPS
medium	186 FPS	128 FPS
high	152 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	161 FPS	69 FPS
medium	131 FPS	62 FPS
high	101 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core 5 220H Open Xeon E5-2697 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core 5 220H	Xeon E5-2697 v4
1080p
low	530 FPS	364 FPS
medium	521 FPS	330 FPS
high	427 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	224 FPS
1440p
low	530 FPS	313 FPS
medium	449 FPS	284 FPS
high	376 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	323 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	330 FPS	195 FPS
medium	279 FPS	178 FPS
high	256 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	120 FPS

Open Core 5 220H Open Xeon E5-2697 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core 5 220H	Xeon E5-2697 v4
1080p
low	530 FPS	525 FPS
medium	530 FPS	525 FPS
high	530 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	530 FPS	525 FPS
1440p
low	530 FPS	525 FPS
medium	530 FPS	525 FPS
high	530 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	496 FPS	525 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	466 FPS
medium	492 FPS	379 FPS
high	439 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core 5 220H Open Xeon E5-2697 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core 5 220H	Xeon E5-2697 v4
1080p
low	530 FPS	525 FPS
medium	530 FPS	525 FPS
high	530 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	530 FPS	525 FPS
1440p
low	530 FPS	525 FPS
medium	530 FPS	525 FPS
high	530 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	530 FPS	486 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	525 FPS
medium	530 FPS	494 FPS
high	500 FPS	437 FPS
ultra	431 FPS	374 FPS

Open Core 5 220H Open Xeon E5-2697 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Xeon E5-2697 v4

Core 5 220H

The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Xeon E5-2697 v4

The Xeon E5-2697 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 20,990 points. Launch price was $2,702.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v4 — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Xeon E5-2697 v4's 20,990 — a 1% lead for the Core 5 220H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2697 v4.

Feature	Core 5 220H	Xeon E5-2697 v4
Cores / Threads	12 / 16	18 / 36+50%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+36%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+17%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	45 MB+150%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	4.5 MB+125%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	21,192	20,990

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.