
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 220H
2024Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Ryzen 9 5900X

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 5900X's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 59.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz+37% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 64 MB+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 38,955+84% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











