
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 220H
2024Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+25.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 220H better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Ryzen 7 5700X

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 5 220H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 22.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+7% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 26,609+26% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











