
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 220H
2024Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Ryzen 7 3700X

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 5 220H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 5.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 32 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 22,430+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











