
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core 5 220H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 220H
2024Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core 5 220H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 220H better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Ryzen 5 5600

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 220H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 21,550+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











