Core 5 220H vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Core 5 220H

12 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2024

Popular choices:

i5-13400F
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 220H

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 25,029).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • +18.1% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 5 220H.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 5 220H better than Core i5-13400F?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core 5 220H is ahead with a 16.6% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 18.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 18.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 5 220H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core 5 220H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.6% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-13400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 18.1% better PassMark. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 220H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 5 220HCore i5-13400F
1080p
low277 FPS171 FPS
medium249 FPS158 FPS
high210 FPS132 FPS
ultra181 FPS112 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS143 FPS
medium186 FPS123 FPS
high152 FPS99 FPS
ultra134 FPS84 FPS
4K
low161 FPS81 FPS
medium131 FPS74 FPS
high101 FPS59 FPS
ultra88 FPS46 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 5 220HCore i5-13400F
1080p
low530 FPS545 FPS
medium521 FPS464 FPS
high427 FPS389 FPS
ultra385 FPS356 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS458 FPS
medium449 FPS403 FPS
high376 FPS345 FPS
ultra323 FPS301 FPS
4K
low330 FPS280 FPS
medium279 FPS247 FPS
high256 FPS231 FPS
ultra225 FPS204 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 5 220HCore i5-13400F
1080p
low530 FPS530 FPS
medium530 FPS449 FPS
high530 FPS415 FPS
ultra530 FPS375 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS490 FPS
medium530 FPS422 FPS
high530 FPS382 FPS
ultra496 FPS343 FPS
4K
low530 FPS393 FPS
medium492 FPS331 FPS
high439 FPS296 FPS
ultra370 FPS246 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 5 220HCore i5-13400F
1080p
low530 FPS626 FPS
medium530 FPS626 FPS
high530 FPS626 FPS
ultra530 FPS626 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS626 FPS
medium530 FPS626 FPS
high530 FPS598 FPS
ultra530 FPS521 FPS
4K
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium530 FPS492 FPS
high500 FPS439 FPS
ultra431 FPS382 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i5-13400F

Intel

Core 5 220H

The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core 5 220H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 16.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
12 / 16+20%
10 / 16
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+7%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+8%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+11%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
21,192
25,029+18%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i5-13400F
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming