Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2667

CPU

GPU

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon E5-2667

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 / 4

7,468

+0.3%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2667

6 / 12

7,442

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,402 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 938.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2667 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2667

2012

Why buy it

✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅400% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,442 vs 7,468).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Xeon E5-2667

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,402 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 938.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2667 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅400% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,442 vs 7,468).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Xeon E5-2667?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2667 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the smarter buy today. Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $1,402 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 938.3% better value on MSRP (49.8 vs 4.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2667 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
1080p
low	165 FPS	158 FPS
medium	141 FPS	137 FPS
high	110 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	134 FPS
medium	119 FPS	114 FPS
high	92 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	62 FPS
medium	58 FPS	56 FPS
high	46 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	34 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon E5-2667

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
1080p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	173 FPS	176 FPS
high	158 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	126 FPS
1440p
low	173 FPS	177 FPS
medium	147 FPS	155 FPS
high	133 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	129 FPS	139 FPS
medium	112 FPS	123 FPS
high	89 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	75 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon E5-2667

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
1080p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	183 FPS	186 FPS
high	160 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	186 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon E5-2667

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
1080p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon E5-2667

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Xeon E5-2667

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2667

The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon E5-2667's 7,442 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+21%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	15360 kB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-63%	32 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	7,468	7,442

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus DDR3 1600 MHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — the Xeon E5-2667 supports 199.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2667 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2667). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2667) — the Xeon E5-2667 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and Intel C602,Intel X79 (Xeon E5-2667).

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+33%	DDR3 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	384 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	40+400%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) / true (Xeon E5-2667). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2667 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Vega 3	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	true
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G launched at $150 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2667 debuted at $1552. On MSRP ($150 vs $1552), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $1402 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 4.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 164.9% better value option.