
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Popular choices:

Core i7-7820EQ
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $228 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i7-7820EQ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,470).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i7-7820EQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Core i7-7820EQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $228 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i7-7820EQ needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,470).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Core i7-7820EQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 61 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 180 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Core i7-7820EQ

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-7820EQ
Core i7-7820EQ
The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-7820EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ — a 22.9% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i7-7820EQ uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Core i7-7820EQ's 7,470 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-7820EQ. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+26% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,468 | 7,470 |
Advanced Features
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i7-7820EQ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i7-7820EQ debuted at $378. On MSRP ($150 vs $378), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $228 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 19.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-7820EQ — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 86.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-60% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8+152% | 19.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













