Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Core i7-7820EQ

AMD

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i7-7820EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $228 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Delivers 151.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i7-7820EQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,470).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i7-7820EQ

2017

Why buy it

  • +0% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Core i7-7820EQ?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is ahead with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820EQ pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. Core i7-7820EQ also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820EQ is the better fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the smarter buy today. Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $228 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i7-7820EQ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0% better PassMark. It is also 151.9% better value on MSRP (49.8 vs 19.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetAthlon Gold PRO 3150GCore i7-7820EQ
1080p
low165 FPS166 FPS
medium141 FPS130 FPS
high110 FPS103 FPS
ultra89 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS139 FPS
medium119 FPS108 FPS
high92 FPS84 FPS
ultra74 FPS66 FPS
4K
low65 FPS66 FPS
medium58 FPS55 FPS
high46 FPS43 FPS
ultra36 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetAthlon Gold PRO 3150GCore i7-7820EQ
1080p
low187 FPS176 FPS
medium173 FPS151 FPS
high158 FPS140 FPS
ultra128 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS153 FPS
medium147 FPS131 FPS
high133 FPS122 FPS
ultra112 FPS95 FPS
4K
low129 FPS120 FPS
medium112 FPS106 FPS
high89 FPS83 FPS
ultra66 FPS61 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetAthlon Gold PRO 3150GCore i7-7820EQ
1080p
low187 FPS187 FPS
medium187 FPS187 FPS
high187 FPS187 FPS
ultra187 FPS187 FPS
1440p
low187 FPS187 FPS
medium187 FPS187 FPS
high187 FPS187 FPS
ultra187 FPS187 FPS
4K
low187 FPS187 FPS
medium183 FPS187 FPS
high160 FPS187 FPS
ultra130 FPS180 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetAthlon Gold PRO 3150GCore i7-7820EQ
1080p
low187 FPS187 FPS
medium187 FPS187 FPS
high187 FPS187 FPS
ultra187 FPS187 FPS
1440p
low187 FPS187 FPS
medium187 FPS187 FPS
high187 FPS187 FPS
ultra187 FPS187 FPS
4K
low187 FPS187 FPS
medium187 FPS187 FPS
high187 FPS187 FPS
ultra187 FPS187 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Core i7-7820EQ

AMD

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-7820EQ

The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-7820EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ — a 22.9% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i7-7820EQ uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Core i7-7820EQ's 7,470 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-7820EQ. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ.

FeatureAthlon Gold PRO 3150GCore i7-7820EQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+26%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB+100%
Process
12 nm-14%
14 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
7,468
7,470
🔧

Advanced Features

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i7-7820EQ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAthlon Gold PRO 3150GCore i7-7820EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Vega 3
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i7-7820EQ debuted at $378. On MSRP ($150 vs $378), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $228 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 19.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-7820EQ — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 86.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon Gold PRO 3150GCore i7-7820EQ
MSRP
$150-60%
$378
Performance per Dollar
49.8+152%
19.8
Release Date
2020
2017