Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2440 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,473).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2440 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Xeon E5-2440 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,473).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2440 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Xeon E5-2440 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2440 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the smarter buy today. Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2440 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (49.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2440 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2440 v2
1080p
low	165 FPS	163 FPS
medium	141 FPS	138 FPS
high	110 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	139 FPS
medium	119 FPS	115 FPS
high	92 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	65 FPS
medium	58 FPS	58 FPS
high	46 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	35 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon E5-2440 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2440 v2
1080p
low	187 FPS	179 FPS
medium	173 FPS	161 FPS
high	158 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	114 FPS
1440p
low	173 FPS	154 FPS
medium	147 FPS	142 FPS
high	133 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	100 FPS
4K
low	129 FPS	100 FPS
medium	112 FPS	93 FPS
high	89 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	65 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon E5-2440 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2440 v2
1080p
low	187 FPS	187 FPS
medium	187 FPS	187 FPS
high	187 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	187 FPS
medium	187 FPS	187 FPS
high	187 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	187 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	187 FPS
medium	183 FPS	187 FPS
high	160 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	187 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon E5-2440 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2440 v2
1080p
low	187 FPS	187 FPS
medium	187 FPS	187 FPS
high	187 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	187 FPS
medium	187 FPS	187 FPS
high	187 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	187 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	187 FPS
medium	187 FPS	187 FPS
high	187 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	187 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon E5-2440 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Xeon E5-2440 v2

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

The Xeon E5-2440 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,473 points. Launch price was $400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2440 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 v2 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon E5-2440 v2's 7,473 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2440 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440 v2.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2440 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+63%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+84%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	7,468	7,473

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.