
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Popular choices:

Core i5-8279U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-8279U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8279U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-8279U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Core i5-8279U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,464 vs 7,468).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Core i5-8279U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-8279U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8279U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-8279U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,464 vs 7,468).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Core i5-8279U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-8279U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-8279U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-8279U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-8279U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Core i5-8279U

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-8279U
Core i5-8279U
The Core i5-8279U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,464 points. Launch price was $320.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i5-8279U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-8279U — a 5% clock advantage for the Core i5-8279U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-8279U uses Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Core i5-8279U's 7,464 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8279U.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-8279U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,468 | 7,464 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8279U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-8279U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i5-8279U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-8279U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













